Monday, 25 April 2011

The Global Indian Takeover – Vijay Mallya joins the list

After the Tata-Coru, Birla-Novelis, Tata Tea-Tetley, Tata-Daewoo trucks, Reliance-Flag Telecom, and countless rumours of Reliance-Dow Chemicals and Reliance-Carrefour, the latest to join the list is the 'Richard Branson' of India - Vijay Mallya.
United Spirits, acquired Scotland based Whyte & Mackay for $1.18billion, with this the company has become the world's second largest liquor company. W&M has a 9% share of the total global scotch market and leading supplier of scotch whisky.

This makes a strategic fit for company, as rising disposable income and brand preferences have driven scotch whisky demand to 30% in India as compared to 12% for liquor market. It would also provide access to EU markets, Russia and China.
The move was greeted by the market too, which is reflected in the company's share price today. Surely, its time for Vijay Mallya to raise a toast and have 'good times'.
Going by the things ahead and ambitions, its not far when Vijay Mallya could buyout a major international airline. Already, Kingfisher Airlines is the first Indian company to place order for 5 Airbus A380, world's largest aircraft.

Friday, 11 March 2011

The rise and fall of Satyam founder

NEW DELHI — The founder of Satyam Computer Services, B. Ramalinga Raju, made a risky proposition to win his first big client, the tractor maker John Deere: If you don't like our service, you don't pay.
With that pitch, which is now the stuff of legend in India, he persuaded John Deere in 1991 to allow his computer programmers to work just across the street from the client's U.S. headquarters, in a house Raju dubbed "Little India." Working only overnight shifts, with no physical contact with John Deere's executives, the programmers got the job done - proving Raju's theory that they could work just as well from India, and helping give birth to the country's outsourcing industry.
Satyam's fall from pioneering iconoclast to the largest corporate fraud in India has been rapid, unexpected and shocking. Now, some analysts and investors are wondering whether the same coolness under pressure and willingness to take risks that attracted supporters, employees and investors to Raju may have laid the groundwork for fraud.
Raju admitted last week to faking about $1 billion in cash on Satyam's books and vastly inflating the company's profit margins, after what he described as a small discrepancy bloomed out of control. The company's survival is in question, and Raju, his brother, B. Rama Raju, and the company's chief financial officer, Srinivas Vadlamani, were in jail Sunday night. The Rajus were arrested Friday, and Vadlamani on Sunday; all three are being investigated on suspicion of cheating, forgery, criminal breach of trust and falsifying documents.
In a move that would have been unfathomable just a month ago, the Indian government ousted Satyam's board Friday. On Sunday, India's minister for corporate affairs filled some of those seats, appointing Deepak Parekh, the chairman of the Housing Development Finance Corp.; Kiran Karnik, the former head of the National Association of Software and Services Companies, a trade group; and C. Achuthan, a lawyer and former member of the country's market regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India. As many as seven other directors are expected to be nominated this week.
As Raju increased Satyam's client roster from John Deere to a third of the companies on the Fortune 500 list, iconoclastic moves became something of a trademark. Satyam was one of the first outsourcing companies to move employees outside of Indian urban centers, and one of the first Indian companies to list on the Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange. It has been more aggressive than most about opening offices in Europe, and setting up training facilities in Western counties like Australia.
Satyam's now-ousted board did contain outsiders - including Krishna Palepu, a professor at Harvard Business School who teaches classes on corporate governance. But the board, and auditors, failed to pick up on the fraud at the company. Instead Palepu and three other board members quietly quit a week before Raju's admission of fraud.
The Indian offshoring industry went through a painful transition in 2004 and 2005, as Western giants like IBM and Accenture started to cut into their business. They were pushed to transform; rather than sending Indians from their headquarters to manage sales and customer relationships, and tightly controlling what they did, these companies started hiring much more expensive local staffs and giving them autonomy.
While there is no evidence that the pricing and market share squeeze caused Raju to embark on the huge fraud that he admitted to last week, they "certainly helped to contribute to the pressures" that he and other executives felt, she said.
A confident, low-key demeanor helped to ingratiate him politically and socially as well. With the expansion of Satyam, the Raju family became leading figures in Hyderabad. They were among the many "Andhras" - the term used to describe Telugu-speaking Hindus from rural villages in Andhra Pradesh - who began moving into Hyderabad beginning in the 1970s and 1980s.
Inspired by Raju, Naidu embarked on a campaign to re-brand Hyderabad, the capital of Andhra Pradesh, as "Cyberabad," and Raju became an informal ambassador helping to lure other technology companies to the city. Microsoft decided to open a new product development center in the city in 1999, and the U.S. president at the time, Bill Clinton, visited the city during a trip to India in March 2000. In gratitude, Naidu helped Raju obtain state land for Satyam's expansion. Many of Raju's other business interests, including the construction companies managed by his sons, also benefited from state contracts.
Those construction companies helped to set Satyam on its downward spiral, as investors balked at what otherwise might have been seen as another pioneering move. On Dec. 16, Satyam said it was planning to acquire two companies, Maytas Properties and Maytas Infra, for $1.6 billion. The two companies are run by Raju's sons, and he and his brother Rama Raju had stakes in them.
People were very concerned about what was going on," said one Satyam executive. "There had never been talk of diversification in Satyam. We were hard-core IT. It just didn't make sense."
When Raju and his top executives met with shareholders that evening, they were faced with a full-scale revolt. The company's stock plummeted, leading to the margin calls that ultimately led Raju to admit the fraud, he said in his confession.
One executive who saw Raju the day after that board meeting said he appeared tired but not especially stressed. "You would never see him frazzled," she said. "His temperament was always very even. He would never lose his cool."
The company has in the past week asked customers to give them assurances, in writing if possible, that they will remain with the company, according to a Satyam executive handling one of its largest accounts, who spoke on condition of anonymity. So far, he said, about 60 percent of its customers had provided such assurances.

The Fall and Rise of IBM - Company Operations

IT'S HARD TO OVERSTATE HOW DIRE THE SITUATION was at IBM when Lou Gerstner took over in 1993. In the course of just a few years, the company had been reduced from widely feared master of the computer universe to poignant symbol of corporate hubris and American industrial decline. Wave after wave of layoffs -- tens of thousands of people at a time -- had swept through the company. Losses were tallied in the billions. Humiliated by Microsoft and seemingly unable to cope with accelerating technological change, IBM seemed headed for a breakup, or worse.
Gerstner was hardly an obvious savior. Without experience in the computer industry, he immediately confirmed skeptics' worst fears by declaring "the last thing IBM needs right now is a vision." He not only rejected the breakup option, but he reversed the decentralization efforts of his disgraced predecessor, John Akers. If he had a grand plan, few could see it.
Today, as Gerstner prepares to depart, the turnaround he engineered looks nothing short of miraculous. [See story, page 56.] While it no longer dominates the computer world, IBM is showing steady growth and solid profits even as the rest of the industry reels from a sharp downturn in demand. In cutting-edge technology, in software, in services, and yes, in old-fashioned computer hardware, IBM is once again a force to be reckoned with.
It's tempting, in light of this history, to give all the credit to Gerstner, and we'd be the last to deny him his due. Indeed, one obvious moral of this story is that leadership matters. One man can make a huge difference, even to a sprawling megalith like IBM.
But the turnaround is also a credit to the deep strength of the company's culture. The pride of "the IBM company," as those inside always call it, looked foolish and vain during the down times. Behind it, though, were real principles: belief in the power and importance of technological advancement, commitment to excellence in everything from R&D and product development to sales and marketing, and attention to the complexities inherent in managing a very large organization.
It's a testament to the power of these pre-Gerstner cultural underpinnings that his successor as CEO will not be a finance guy he brought with him from American Express or RJR Nabisco, but rather an IBM lifer, Sam Palmisano, who rose through the ranks the old-fashioned way. Gerstner's success was possible because the company was filled with smart, committed people who had spent a lot of time wrestling with daunting technology and business issues and had a lot of ideas about how to address them.
A big problem for many of the companies that have emerged in the great tech boom of the 1990s is that they don't have anything to fall back on. As long as the march is onward and upward, everything is rosy. But when the market turns and it's revealed that the CEO doesn't have every answer and that good fortune has not been entirely due to the cleverness of everyone involved, the loss of faith can be devastating, even fatal.
Business success alone is not the mark of a healthy organization, and failure doesn't mean that all is rotten. That's a nice lesson to learn from IBM.

ENRON

It is the first name which comes into mind when rise and fall of a company is discussed.
Enron Corporation (former NYSE ticker symbol ENE) was an American energy, commodities, and services company based in Houston, Texas. Before its bankruptcy in late 2001, Enron employed approximately 22,000 staff and was one of the world's leading electricity, natural gas, communications, and pulp and paper companies, with claimed revenues of nearly $101 billion in 2000.[1] Fortune named Enron "America's Most Innovative Company" for six consecutive years. At the end of 2001, it was revealed that its reported financial condition was sustained substantially by institutionalized, systematic, and creatively planned accounting fraud, known as the "Enron scandal". Enron has since become a popular symbol of willful corporate fraud and corruption. The scandal also brought into question the accounting practices and activities of many corporations throughout the United States and was a factor in the creation of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002. The scandal also affected the wider business world by causing the dissolution of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm.[2]
Enron filed for bankruptcy protection in the Southern District of New York in late 2001 and selected Weil, Gotshal & Manges as its bankruptcy counsel. It emerged from bankruptcy in November 2004, pursuant to a court-approved plan of reorganization, after one of the biggest and most complex bankruptcy cases in U.S. history. A new board of directors changed the name of Enron to Enron Creditors Recovery Corp., and focused on reorganizing and liquidating certain operations and assets of the pre-bankruptcy Enron.[3] On September 7, 2006, Enron sold Prisma Energy International Inc., its last remaining business, to Ashmore Energy International Ltd. (now AEI).
  
  THE ENRON SCANDAL
 Enron's nontransparent financial statements did not clearly depict its operations and finances with shareholders and analysts.[11][12] In addition, its complex business model and unethical practices required that the company use accounting limitations to misrepresent earnings and modify the balance sheet to portray a favorable depiction of its performance.[13] According to McLean and Elkid in their book The Smartest Guys in the Room, "The Enron scandal grew out of a steady accumulation of habits and values and actions that began years before and finally spiraled out of control."[14] In an article by James Bodurtha, Jr., he argues that from 1997 until its demise, "the primary motivations for Enron's accounting and financial transactions seem to have been to keep reported income and reported cash flow up, asset values inflated, and liabilities off the books."

The Enron story has produced many victims, the most tragic of which is a former vice-chairman of the company who committed suicide, apparently in connection with his role in the scandal. Another 4,500 individuals have seen their careers ended abruptly by the reckless acts of a few. Enron’s core values of respect, integrity, communication and excellence stand in satirical contrast to allegations now being made public. Personally, I had referred several of our best and brightest accounting, finance and MBA graduates to Enron, hoping they could gain valuable experience from seeing things done right. These included a very bright training consultant who had lost her job in 2000 with a Houston consulting firm as a result of a reduction in force. She has lost her second job in 18 months through no fault of her own. Other former students still hanging on at Enron face an uncertain future as the company fights for survival. 

source: http://www.journalofaccountancy.com/Issues/2002/Apr/TheRiseAndFallOfEnron.htm